I did not build this because job search was impossible. I built it because the decision logic was too easy to keep in my head and too important to apply inconsistently. So I wrote my own formula for what a good job looks like, then turned it into a system.

This piece continues from the decision system designed in the previous experiment. The weeks of manual filtering, the fatigue that builds when volume meets judgment week after week, and what it took to turn the logic into something that could make the output consistent.

Most people search for a good job. But good and right are two different things. This piece introduces a four-dimensional map, adapted from Ikigai, that helps you see where a role actually sits, and why most opportunities only land in one or two intersections, not the centre.

Job searching is not a lack of opportunity problem.
It is a signal, attention, and decision quality problem.

This experiment explores how system design can reduce noise, clarify direction, and protect energy before commitment sets in.